You are viewing scottedelman

 
 
13 February 2008 @ 06:18 am
Steve Gerber Was Crazy  
With all of the love currently being shown online to the high-profile projects Steve Gerber had been involved with—including Howard the Duck, Omega the Unknown, and Man-Thing—I want to make sure that everyone also remembers his absurd work as editor of Crazy magazine.

Crazy was intended by Marvel to be just another MAD clone, and while it did have the standard movie spoofs everyone has come to expect from that sort of knock-off magazine, it also featured Bob Foster's bizarre "History of Moosekind" series, artwork by Lee Mars, Will Eisner, and Marie Severin, and strange photo features starring unidentified members of the Marvel Bullpen.

And, oh, yes, then there were Steve's offbeat editorials.

Here's one of them, titled "Beat the Scuzzies," from the August 1975 issue of Crazy. (Click on it to see a larger version. You might have to click on it a second time to view it in easily readable form.) It includes Steve's recommendation for a 1976 presidential candidate, so it's timely again now.

The inside front cover of the same issue of Crazy spotlights another piece of Steve's writing, this one a spoof ad featuring one of those undercover Marvel staffers I mentioned.

Me.

The spoof took off on a bizarre ad which was then running in all the Marvel Comics books of the time about Dim Mak and the Black Dragon Fighting Society. I was chosen to appear in the parody because with my shaggy hair and beard I looked wild enough to pass for the supposed Count Dumme of the Black Cow Fighting Society, though I suspect it was also because I was also the only Bullpenner at the time who had a bathrobe that could pass for a gi.

The accompanying text was a hilarious piece of writing (again, click on through to find it in more easily readable form), but due to my picture, which I've snatched for the icon above, and also because it appeared uncredited, people always thought I was the one who wrote it. But no, it was Steve, as I had to tell people again and again back then whenever they came around to compliment me on what a great parody ad I'd written.

So in the midst of the celebration for Steve's revolutionary superhero work, don't forget that his sense of whimsy also popped up in places you might not have expected. Too bad the world hadn't let him find an outlet for more of that absurd prose.
 
 
( 13 comments — Leave a comment )
karen_w_newtonkaren_w_newton on February 13th, 2008 02:47 pm (UTC)
Sounds like he was the Sacha Baron Cohen of his day.

And you do look really zany in that picture.
sclerotic_rings on February 13th, 2008 02:51 pm (UTC)
The first rule of Buh Zerk is you do not talk about Buh Zerk
Scott, I hope you know that my co-workers think I'm insane. My boss, who regularly quotes William Burroughs and Frank Zappa in staff meetings, thinks I'm nuts. I now have tears of laughter running down my legs from this, and now I want to see if I can set up the same sort of group dedicated to gardening.
scottedelmanscottedelman on February 13th, 2008 03:10 pm (UTC)
Re: The first rule of Buh Zerk is you do not talk about Buh Zerk
Well, since I happen to know that everybody thinks you're insane, I guess that means I know that your co-workers think you're insane, too.
The Texas Triffid Ranch - Odd Plants and Odditiestxtriffidranch on February 13th, 2008 03:20 pm (UTC)
Re: The first rule of Buh Zerk is you do not talk about Buh Zerk
In my department, it's all a matter of perspective. One of my co-workers was nicknamed "Beast Rabban" for a reason.
Nick Mamatasnihilistic_kid on February 13th, 2008 03:04 pm (UTC)
Can I link your picture to a martial arts bulletin board on which I participate? It's semi-relevant again, as the guys who ended up with the BDFS marks and rights are trying to sue some guy for making a documentary "without permission." (They're not too up on what intellectual property actually does.)

Edited at 2008-02-13 03:04 pm (UTC)
scottedelmanscottedelman on February 13th, 2008 03:24 pm (UTC)
Go for it!

As for the notion of "trying to sue," I'm sure they could sue, because anyone who can find a gullible lawyer can sue anyone about anything. But based on my understanding of the law, there's no case there. Your friends might still have to be ready to reach into their pockets to mount a defense, though.
Nick Mamatasnihilistic_kid on February 13th, 2008 03:37 pm (UTC)
I say trying because they actually couldn't find a lawyer and wrote up all the documents themselves (you can see them on justia I believe), and the material includes sentences like "John took these pictures and he doesn't have permission for it." (to refer to a photo the documentarian licensed from some clip art place).

The documentarians managed to get Lessig's people for the defense. The case is actually going down here in Boston on Friday; I'm tempted to pop in if I have the time.
coppervalecoppervale on February 13th, 2008 03:11 pm (UTC)
That's genius, Scott.

I just saw Bob Foster at the CAPS meeting in Burbank. Nice to do the memory lane thing, now and again - although I'm resolved to do it more frequently, in person, before people are gone.
jmsullivan on February 14th, 2008 07:00 am (UTC)
Reminds me of another GREAT FIGHTING ART from the other side of the Atlantic.

Based on the twin principles THAT the best FORM of defense is attack, and THE most important element of attack is surprise. Thus WITH this art you may be able to render your assailant unconscious before he attacks YOU, or indeed before he is aware of your VERY EXISTENCE.

http://ppsa.com/gif/llap01.gif

Hmm, that secret master looks a little like you too, Scott!

Edited at 2008-02-14 07:02 am (UTC)
scottedelman: Mariescottedelman on February 14th, 2008 07:17 pm (UTC)
I've seen that before, but I can't remember from where. Was it it filched from the back of an Alan Moore comic?
jmsullivan on February 14th, 2008 07:30 pm (UTC)
No, that was a Monty Python thing, from one of their books.
tomdoyletomdoyle on February 20th, 2008 09:58 pm (UTC)
Don't know if you've seen this article yet:
http://www.slate.com/id/2184806/
scottedelmanscottedelman on February 21st, 2008 01:51 am (UTC)
I'd been traveling and so hadn't seen that one until you pointed it out. Thanks!

It's interesting that they quoted his comment that "I still believe that writers and artists who claim to respect the work of creators past should demonstrate that respect by leaving the work alone," but not the follow-up quote I remember in which he had to address the fact that he had himself also worked on characters created by others. I can't remember exactly what he'd said, though, but he did have to come to terms with that.
( 13 comments — Leave a comment )